Skip to main content

Response Interruption/Redirection (RIR)

The introduction of a prompt, comment, or other distractors when an interfering behavior is occurring that is designed to divert the learner’s attention away from the interfering behavior and results in its reduction.

Evidence Based
Ages: Skip to Evidence

Steps for Implementation

Step 1. Identifying the Interfering Behavior

  1. Identify the characteristics of the interfering behavior by using direct observation methods that include:
    • Antecedent -Behavior -Consequence data charts
    • Scatterplots
  2. Use direct assessment results to identify:
    • where the behavior is happening;
    • with whom the behavior is occurring;
    • when the behavior is happening;
    • activities during which the behavior occurs;
    • what other students are doing when the behavior starts;
    • what teachers/adults are doing when the behavior starts;
    • proximity to other students, teachers, and/or adults;
    • the noise level in the environment;
    • the number of individuals in the area;
    • other environmental conditions; and
    • the function of the behavior.
  3. Develop a hypothesis statement for the interfering behavior that includes:
    • the setting events,
    • a restatement and refinement of the description of the interfering behavior, and
    • the function the behavior serves.
  4. Identify a more appropriate alternative behavior to take the place of the interfering behavior.

Step 2. Collecting Baseline Data

  1. Measure the learner’s engagement in the interfering behavior before implementing RIR by collecting the following:
    • Frequency data
    • Interval data
    • Duration data
  2. Collect baseline data for a minimum of four days before implementing RIR.
  3. Collect baseline data in each setting/activity for four days.

Step 3. Implementing RIR

  1. Praise the learner’s independent use of appropriate skills.
  2. When the learner begins to exhibit an interfering behavior, interrupt the learner’s attempts by using:
    • physical blocking, and
    • verbal blocking.
  3. For learners who engage in vocal stereotypies, redirect learners to use an identified alternative behavior by:
    • saying the learner’s name in a neutral tone of voice,
    • establishing eye contact, and
    • asking a social question to prompt the learner to use an alternative vocalization.
  4. For learners who engage in motor stereotypies or self-injurious behavior, redirect them to engage in an identified alternative behavior by:
    • saying the learner’s name in a neutral tone of voice,
    • establishing eye contact, and
    • using the system of least-to-most prompts to help the learner engage in the alternative behavior.
  5. For learners who engage in pica, redirect them to engage in an identified alternative behavior by:
    • making a preferred food item freely available during times when pica is prevalent,
    • saying the learner’s name in a neutral tone of voice,
    • establishing eye contact, and
    • using the system of least-to-most prompts to help the learner engage in the alternative behavior.
  6. After redirecting the learner with ASD to the alternative behavior, require the learner to engage in the alternative behavior for a specified period of time.
  7. Reinforce the learner’s use of the alternative behavior.

Step 4. Monitoring Learner Progress

  1. Use progress monitoring data to evaluate whether the interfering behavior is decreasing as a result of the intervention.
  2. Use progress monitoring data to evaluate the learner’s use of the alternative behavior in settings/activities where the interfering behavior typically occurs.
  3. Use progress monitoring data to adjust intervention strategies if the interfering behavior is not decreasing.

Research and Outcomes

Research Summary

Age Range: 3-22

Skills: Communication, social, play, school readiness, academic/pre-academic, adaptive/self-help, challenging/interfering behavior, motor

Settings: Home, school, community

Evidence Rating: Evidence Based

The information found in the Research Summary table is updated following a literature review of new research and these ages, skills, and settings reflects information from this review.

Outcomes Matrix

The Outcomes Matrix shows outcome areas by age for which this evidence based practice is effective
Age: 0-5 6-14 15-22
Academic/Pre-academic Yes Yes
Challenging/Interfering Behavior Yes Yes Yes
Cognitive
Communication Yes Yes
Joint Attention
Mental Health
Motor Yes
Play Yes Yes
School Readiness Yes Yes
Self-determination
Social Yes Yes
Vocational
More about Intervention Outcomes

Response interruption/redirection (RIR) involves the introduction of a prompt, comment, or other distractor when an interfering behavior is occurring that is designed to divert the learner’s attention away from the interfering behavior and results in its reduction. Specifically, RIR is used predominantly to address behaviors that are repetitive, stereotypical, and/or self-injurious. RIR often is implemented after a functional behavior assessment (FBA) has been conducted to identify the function of the interfering behavior. RIR is particularly useful with persistent interfering behaviors that occur in the absence of other people, in a number of different settings, and during a variety of tasks. These behaviors often are not maintained by attention or escape. Instead, they are more likely maintained by sensory reinforcement and are often resistant to intervention attempts. RIR is particularly effective with sensory-maintained behaviors because learners are interrupted from engaging in interfering behaviors and redirected to more appropriate, alternative behaviors (Steinbrenner, et al., 2020)

RIR may involve a high level of physical prompting/contact. Careful consideration for less restrictive interventions should take place prior to implementing RIR.